Solution
PEP & Sanctions Screening
Sanctions, PEP & Adverse Media Screening
Screen customers and counterparties against financial crime risk with greater context and control
Screening sits inside the compliance case rather than beside it, so a reviewer sees the customer, the match and the evidence together — and the outcome is recorded where auditors will look for it.
Workflow
- 01Screen
- 02Match
- 03Review
- 04Decide
- 05Evidence
- 06Re-screen
Business problem
Screening often produces high alert volumes with limited context, making it hard to evidence why a match was cleared or escalated.
The JRC RegRisk solution
Screening is applied within the compliance case, so every match, decision and rationale is recorded against a named reviewer alongside the customer record.
Capabilities
What the solution covers
Capability scope is configured with the institution during implementation.
What is screened
- Sanctions lists
- Politically exposed persons (PEPs)
- Adverse media
- Customer screening for individuals
- Business and counterparty screening
How matches are handled
- Match review with customer context in view
- Escalation and four-eyes review
- Documented rationale for clearing or escalating a match
- Ongoing monitoring and re-screening of existing customers
Evidence
- Screening evidence retained against the case
- Named reviewer, timestamp and decision recorded
- Exportable record for internal audit and supervisory review
Outcomes
Main benefits
- Screening decisions that can be explained and evidenced
- Consistent handling across teams and markets
- Fewer disconnected tools in the onboarding chain
Suitable institutions
Capabilities
Full capability list
- Sanctions screening for individuals and businesses
- PEP identification and enhanced due diligence handling
- Adverse media review within the case record
- Match handling, escalation and four-eyes review
- Ongoing re-screening of existing customers
- Screening evidence retained in the audit trail